Layout Image
  • Home
  • Reports
    • Best Practice Case Studies Reports
    • Master Plan Reports
    • Trends & Strategies Reports
    • Online Communities
      • Trends & Strategies
      • Case Studies
      • The Master Plan
    • Website Search
      • The Master Plan
    • How They Buy
    • Home/Home Office Support
  • Services
    • Best Practice Case Studies Library
    • Competitive Evaluations
    • Teleconferences
  • The Inside Track
    • siteIQ Polls
  • Website Rankings
    • 2010 eBusiness Index Rankings
    • 2010 Enterprise Software
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Why siteIQ?
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Archive for oracle.com

When support worlds collide. How to screw up a new market gambit

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (1)
Thursday, August 19th, 2010

Happy campers now, unhappy campers laterCompanies eying new markets should avoid “Marie Antoinette” and “Frankenstein” support strategies. Here’s why.

You can tell a lot about a company’s prime customers by its Website—and even more by how customers fresh from acquisitions and market gambits get lost in the shuffle.

Examine companies like Dell, that has moved from its consumer roots into enterprise markets. Or, IBM’s, CA’s and Cisco’s endeavors to translate historical successes in the enterprise realm into SMB markets. And then there is Oracle’s attempt to execute simultaneous vertical and horizontal market strategies by lashing together its software applications with Sun’s hardware and storage products. There are plenty of examples.

If you think the “tell” of these (and other) companies’ successes or failures are found in their online marketing content, you would be looking in the wrong direction. In reality, the “tell” is found in their support and training zones.

Before support and training Web teams even entertain the hope for a successful market move, they must take these two approaches off the table:  Read More→

Bookmark and Share
Comments (1)
Categories : Branding, Marketing, POV (point of view), Strategy, Support
Tags : acquisitions, ca.com, cisco.com, dell.com, ibm.com, mergers, oracle.com, Support

Oracle.com: New game, new rules, new problems

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (6)
Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

Oracle.com + Sun.com = less than the sum of their parts

Oracle.com has been the big Kahuna in the enterprise software industry for the past couple of years when it finally slipped past IBM’s Software Group site, which has been stuck in idle since early 2008. Then it decided to change the rules of its own game.

In 2009 Oracle bought Sun Microsystems in a quest to graduate into the business of selling hardware, software & services to the enterprise business set. Along with its red, white and black cap and gown, Oracle now gets to compete with the likes of IBM, HP and Dell. The question is, of course, how well does the combined Oracle.com & Sun.com sites perform against competitors that have been marketing & selling complex products online for well over a decade?

The answer is: not very well.

Read More→

Bookmark and Share
Comments (6)
Categories : POV (point of view), Website Rankings
Tags : dell.com, emc.com, hp.com, ibm.com, intel.com, oracle.com, sun.com

The Baby and the Bathwater

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (2)
Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

In July I shared some thoughts about the likely impact of Oracle’s acquisition of Sun Microsystems from a Website perspective – plus a couple of suggestions from the peanut gallery. In the past few weeks, an era came to an end as some of the industry’s best and brightest Web professionals left the Sun.com team for greener pastures.

Of course, gone is not forgotten on the Web. Sun.com’s award winning usability & effectiveness and trendsetting best practices will be available online via the Wayback archives for years to come. For our part, our decade of work with the Sun.com team has generated gigs of best practices reviews. Although I can’t predict exactly when the Sun.com site will become the newest Borg within Oracle.com’s red and  white collective – I know that its forward thinking designs and best practices will be part of our analysis for years to come.

My hat is off to these professionals. Oracle’s loss is certain to be someone else’s gain.

Bookmark and Share
Comments (2)
Categories : POV (point of view), Strategy
Tags : oracle.com, sun.com

Why Oracle.com has its hands full

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (1)
Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

OK, it’s official. Oracle will acquire Sun Microsystems by the end of the summer. Although I have to give Oracle kudos for a brilliant strategic acquisition (and tweaking IBM’s nose for good measure), flipping the Sun.com site into the Oracle paradigm won’t be as easy as its other acquisitions.

I’ve watched Oracle for about 30 years as an industry analyst — which means I’ve had a front row seat for all of Oracle’s growth, and most of its acquisitions.

When acquisitions are the issue, the script has always been pretty much the same. Oracle announces its intent to purchase an IT industry firm, engages in various firefights with a bevy of aggrieved CEOs and shareholders, occasionally spends some quality time with the SEC, finally closes the deal — and then takes the acquired company’s Website off the airwaves about two nanoseconds after the ink on the deal dries.

Generally, the first iteration of this process is a bit ham handed. Forget preserving the acquired company’s Web prowess & knowledge, brand, share of mind, or easing customers into a new parent organization. The acquired company’s URL is instantly directed to a landing page deep inside Oracle.com that announces the acquisition, positions the company’s products within Oracle’s strategic roster, points visitors to support, and  Read More→

Bookmark and Share
Comments (1)
Categories : Design, Marketing, POV (point of view), Strategy
Tags : dell.com, developers, ibm, ibm software group, java, oracle.com, POV (point of view), product marketing, Strategy, sun.com

What we learned while lurking on leading communities

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (1)
Friday, July 24th, 2009

Although evaluating 10 leading IT communities based on 490 criteria was a bit of a slog (and pencils out to looking for and scoring 4,900 types of content, features and capabilities, plus another 320 usability metrics), we did have some fun during the process.  While Kenna did the deep diving wearing her “power user” hat, I took a tour through every community with my “lurker beanie” on. The point of the exercise was to see how these communities look to visitors who are looking around to see if they want to join the party versus what’s actually delivered once you’ve married into the family.

It was a bit of a lark, to be sure. And like many of our larks, it delivered some interesting results.

lurker2To see why, take a peek at this graph that illustrates how the communities operated by seven leading IT companies fare based on 32 usability metrics.

First, the good news. SAP and Citrix deliver pretty much what is expected. The bad news for Citrix is that, at a 54% usability score, its community doesn’t look very usable – and it isn’t. At the other end of the spectrum, SAP’s communities appear to be the most usable – and (dismal look and feel aside) they are.

Next, let’s look at the sites that exceeded expectations. That would be Dell. My tour of the community delivered Dell an average 69.1% usability score. At 70.8%, Kenna’s power drive says that Dell’s communities actually deliver slightly more than expected.

This leaves us with the communities that are like an unfortunate blind date. Among these, EMC and Oracle fared worst.

My tour of EMC’s communities delivered good, but not great, usability results (62.4%), but Kenna’s deep dive shows that once you get past the flash, this community is almost unusable.

Oracle also seemed to be a reasonably usable venue if you are just lurking around, and my usability scores averaged out to 60.8%. By the time Kenna finished rambling through the site’s inconsistent behaviors and technical problems, she thought 54% was a gift.

Bookmark and Share
Comments (1)
Categories : Communities, Design, POV (point of view), Web 2.0, Website Rankings
Tags : best practices, citrix.com, dell.com, emc.com, online communities, oracle.com, sap.com, sun.com, symantec.com, Usability
Next Page »

 Subscribe

Categories

  • Branding
  • Communities
  • Design
  • eSelling
  • Global Websites
  • Marketing
  • Navigation
  • POV (point of view)
  • Search
  • Social Media & Social Networks
  • Strategy
  • Support
  • Uncategorized
  • Usability
  • Web 2.0
  • Website Launches
  • Website Rankings

Tags

adobe.com best practice brand ca.com cisco.com Communities community marketing corporate marketing dell dell.com Design ebusiness index ecommerce eds.com emc.com eSelling hp hp.com ibm ibm.com ibm global services intel.com juniper.net Marketing microsoft.com Navigation newegg.com nortel.com oracle.com product marketing sap.com services marketing Social Media social network Strategy sun.com Support symantec.com Twitter Usability Web 2.0 website design website development website rankings worst practice

Receive New Best Practice Alerts


Yes! Please sign me up for the siteIQ Digest.

Your Email      

Sending ...

Follow Marty Gruhn on Twitter

  • Just reviewed HP.com's new networking zone & social media behaviors: How Twitter can ruin a marketing campaign http://bit.ly/9kqMEh about 21 hours ago from web
  • I love sales forces. They create the rules and then complain about the results http://bit.ly/aJvvSG 07:24:22 PM August 31, 2010 from web

siteIQ Poll | How Does Your Website Sell?

Websites are built to sell. Products. Services. Opinions. Access. Most companies use their Website to inform & engage. But smart companies see them in a totally different light. For these organizations, their Website is the most invaluable salesperson on their team. The question is: What roll does your Website play in your selling process?

SiteIQ • Copyright © 2010 All Rights Reserved