Layout Image
  • Home
  • Reports
    • Best Practice Case Studies Reports
    • Master Plan Reports
    • Trends & Strategies Reports
    • Online Communities
      • Trends & Strategies
      • Case Studies
      • The Master Plan
    • Website Search
      • The Master Plan
    • How They Buy
    • Home/Home Office Support
  • Services
    • Best Practice Case Studies Library
    • Competitive Evaluations
    • Teleconferences
  • The Inside Track
    • siteIQ Polls
  • Website Rankings
    • 2010 eBusiness Index Rankings
    • 2010 Enterprise Software
  • About Us
    • Who We Are
    • Why siteIQ?
  • Contact Us
  • Client Login

Archive for Web 2.0

The borg, the butterfly, and the problem

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (0)
Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Too many dotcom Web teams are borgs and butterflies. They need to be problem solvers.

I faithfully read Seth Goden’s blog every morning. One reason is that it’s blissfully short [memo to self]. The other reason is the golden marketing nuggets he brings to the table.

This morning is such a moment – and one that speaks to why so many LOB execs and stakeholders constantly push back on dotcom Web teams pitching new designs or the latest industry trends.

They don’t think they have a problem.

Face it. From most stakeholders’ perspective, dotcom teams come in two flavors: the “borg” [you will be assimilated] and the “butterfly” [this is the latest trend and we need to capitalize on it].  Neither are focused on a problem from the stakeholder’s point of view.

But what if a dotcom team saw its stakeholders as customers?  Like any good salesperson, the team would help stakeholders identify a problem and explore its cost or impact on the LOB.

In other words, dotcom teams should sell the problem.

Until stakeholders agree that they have a problem, the solution doesn’t count. That’s why so many projects end up in chaos.  In pushback, deliberate inertia, and stakeholders who spend their time deliberately coloring outside of the lines.

Bookmark and Share
Comments (0)
Categories : POV (point of view), Social Media & Social Networks, Strategy, Web 2.0, Website Launches

The new CA.com | One step forward, three steps back

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (2)
Wednesday, July 21st, 2010

The new CA.com has retained its powerful “snacking” architecture but missed the Web 2.0 & social media memos

In case you haven’t noticed, CA.com recently launched a new site. As is our custom, we’ve delayed our deep-drive about six weeks to let the CA.com team find snafus and work out the bugs. Now it’s time to put the site through its paces. Here’s our Cliff’s Notes analysis: (siteIQ clients can read the complete analysis here. (log in required)

Pros

CA.com has retained its product marketing “snacking architecture,” which is one of the most powerful in the business. If you haven’t seen this in action, pick any CA product and follow the bouncing ball.

CA.com is one of few sites that know how to craft marketing content as a set of questions that speak to visitor objectives. If you need inspiration, CA.com is the place to start.

CA.com’s new design is consistent across the site; not many page owners missed the memo. CA.com is yet another example of the iterative design strategy we discussed in a recent post.

CA.com makes great use of tab-top organization on its product level pages (shades of Sun.com, yikes!). Overall, a tab-top tour de force.

Neutral

CA.com’s play on mega-menus brings it into the fold, but these menus are much less impressive than those deployed by Cisco.com and Juniper.net. Close, but no cigar.

Cons

CA.com just couldn’t resist the “eye candy” factor on its home page. In this case, it’s those revolving boxes that use type fonts that are a Mr. Magoo moment at any screen size – and whirl at the drop of a hat. Here, CA.com gets a B+ for visual impact – and D- for usability and relevance. Read More→

Bookmark and Share
Comments (2)
Categories : Design, POV (point of view), Social Media & Social Networks, Web 2.0, Website Launches
Tags : ca.com, Social Media, Web 2.0, website launches

CA.com & Oracle.com: Two peas in a different pod

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (0)
Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Our new Website rankings are rolling out. Here’s what happened when we changed the rules of the game

I just put the finishing touches on our new eBusiness Index report that profiles how CA.com, IBM Software Group, Oracle.com, SAP.com, and SAS.com fared (and compared) during our recent evaluations.

This was a particularly important evaluation since it’s based on our new benchmark that tracks and measures a ton of new requirements, including online communities and the Web 2.0 and social media behaviors that are now industry requirements. To get a gauge on the impact of these revolutions, our 2010 benchmark almost doubled in size — from 726 criteria in 2009 to 1,177 requirements this year.

As always, there’s lots of gems in the numbers.

For starters, IBM’s Software Group zone (www.ibm.com/software) – the perennial competitive leader over the past few years – slipped to third place based on these stiffer requirements. It faces plenty of challenges this year, including getting its search up to industry muster, fixing product marketing and ecommerce usability, and making its services and industry marketing zones more complete & effective.

Although Oracle.com ended up in first place on a technical basis, it’s really in a tie with CA.com. The numbers break down like this: Oracle.com has more ‘stuff’, but CA.com is more usable. Read More→

Bookmark and Share
Comments (0)
Categories : Web 2.0, Website Rankings

Why social networks, communities, and Web 2.0 aren’t B2B shotguns

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (1)
Wednesday, April 7th, 2010

Social network, communities and Web 2.0 aren't shotgunsIt’s time to stop fiddling around and apply them where they matter

The French have a wonderful phrase “plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose”. It’s an elegant way to say that the more things change, the more they remain the same.

That’s certainly the case when you consider the complex B2B buying process. Since our last update in 2006, this process remains the same. It’s still dictated by task forces and committees who must wade through 17 steps to get to the finish line. Participants are still purchase influencers, rather than the decision makers companies crave. Websites still influence only 5 steps in the buying process.

But that doesn’t mean that everything remains the same. Read More→

Bookmark and Share
Comments (1)
Categories : Communities, Marketing, Social Media & Social Networks, Strategy, Web 2.0, eSelling
Tags : B2B buying, B2b selling, Communities, eSelling, Marketing, podcast, Social Media, social networks, Strategy, video, Web 2.0, webinar

Mega and Fat Become the Fashions of the Day

By Marty Gruhn · Comments (2)
Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Click on this graph to see a lightbox of all best practices in this post

Five Websites are setting the pace

It’s interesting how something starts to hit a tipping point on the IT Web. Mega-menus are one of these designs – and fat footers aren’t far behind them.

In the mega-menu race, there are two main strategies in play, and some good and best practices worth considering.

On the strategy side, we have two basic approaches in evidence these days: mega-menus targeted at straight navigation – and those that add product marketing, corporate marketing and call to action dimensions.  In every case, there are great examples of both approaches on the IT Web.  Here’s some places to start: Read More→

Bookmark and Share
Comments (2)
Categories : Design, Navigation, Usability, Web 2.0
Tags : brocade.com, dell.com, Design, emc.com, fat footer, hp.com, insight.com, juniper.net, mega-menu, microsoft.com, Navigation, newegg.com, novell.com, Usability, Web 2.0
Next Page »

 Subscribe

Categories

  • Branding
  • Communities
  • Design
  • eSelling
  • Global Websites
  • Marketing
  • Navigation
  • POV (point of view)
  • Search
  • Social Media & Social Networks
  • Strategy
  • Support
  • Uncategorized
  • Usability
  • Web 2.0
  • Website Launches
  • Website Rankings

Tags

adobe.com best practice brand ca.com cisco.com Communities community marketing corporate marketing dell dell.com Design ebusiness index ecommerce eds.com emc.com eSelling hp hp.com ibm ibm.com ibm global services intel.com juniper.net Marketing microsoft.com Navigation newegg.com nortel.com oracle.com product marketing sap.com services marketing Social Media social network Strategy sun.com Support symantec.com Twitter Usability Web 2.0 website design website development website rankings worst practice

Receive New Best Practice Alerts


Yes! Please sign me up for the siteIQ Digest.

Your Email      

Sending ...

Follow Marty Gruhn on Twitter

  • Sorry! My Tweets are on a break, please check back in a little while.

siteIQ Poll | How Does Your Website Sell?

Websites are built to sell. Products. Services. Opinions. Access. Most companies use their Website to inform & engage. But smart companies see them in a totally different light. For these organizations, their Website is the most invaluable salesperson on their team. The question is: What roll does your Website play in your selling process?

SiteIQ • Copyright © 2010 All Rights Reserved